Re: Future of the GELS mailing list

[YongLucy 73674 <lucyyong@huawei.com>]

make sense. support!

*******************************************************************************************
 This email and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it!
 *******************************************************************************************

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, July 10, 2006 7:14 pm
Subject: Re: Future of the GELS mailing list

> Adrian,
> 
> I would suggest shutting down the gels list.  That would guarantee 
> that we
> only see the messages once.
> 
> Cheers,
> Andy
> 
> On 7/10/06, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We reached a sort-of decision in CCAMP today on the future of 
> GELS. You
> > can
> > see this on the chairs slides at
> > http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06jul/slides/ccamp-
> 15.ppt#286,8,GELS?>
> > One question remains.
> > Should the GELS mailing list continue or should all discussions 
> move to
> > the
> > CCAMP list?
> >
> > I am personally inclined to think that the separate list is a 
> useful venue
> > for discussions that might not be completely dedicated to GMPLS 
> protocol> issues. On the other hand, maybe the WG would like all 
> discussions in the
> > same place.
> >
> > I would prefer that we stopped copying emails to both lists.
> >
> > Opinions?
> > Adrian
> >
>