RE: Future of the GELS mailing list

To: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>, "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>

Subject: RE: Future of the GELS mailing list

From: "Zafar Ali \(zali\)" <zali@cisco.com>

Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 01:56:34 -0400

Authentication-results: sj-dkim-6.cisco.com; header.From=zali@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( 59 extraneous bytes; sig from cisco.com verified; );

Cc: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>, <gels@rtg.ietf.org>

Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=5093; t=1152597398; x=1153461398; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim6001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=zali@cisco.com; z=From:=22Zafar=20Ali=20\(zali\)=22=20<zali@cisco.com> |Subject:RE=3A=20Future=20of=20the=20GELS=20mailing=20list; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3DOccBOx7CPhyni94g+9U0bcoT04E=3D; b=fuThaJ/AhvPB5gKOvgC9VXKw9R4uQ2hyq1lZcyZGYqEIBxyX91jpgefz9kZuBko7Em/jGTvW zsxc3TcOkhxSxqG24U5ayxAjkfrTeYVATANzce2AAzErWLVMEzjVPb55;

From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andrew G. Malis
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 8:15 PM
To: Adrian Farrel
Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org; gels@rtg.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Future of the GELS mailing list

Adrian,

I would suggest shutting down the gels list.

I agree w/ shutting down the gels list.

Thanks

Regards... Zafar

That would guarantee that we only see the messages once.

Cheers,
Andy

On 7/10/06, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

Hi,

We reached a sort-of decision in CCAMP today on the future of GELS. You can
see this on the chairs slides at
http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06jul/slides/ccamp-15.ppt#286,8,GELS ?

One question remains.
Should the GELS mailing list continue or should all discussions move to the
CCAMP list?

I am personally inclined to think that the separate list is a useful venue
for discussions that might not be completely dedicated to GMPLS protocol
issues. On the other hand, maybe the WG would like all discussions in the
same place.

I would prefer that we stopped copying emails to both lists.

Opinions?
Adrian