Re: Future of the GELS mailing list

To: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>

Subject: Re: Future of the GELS mailing list

From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 20:14:57 -0400

Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org, gels@rtg.ietf.org

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=h2bti99B0xGBvFcPk5MJfBi6WxdJWmMoyGxiXfh52j/oHwuUOy6rGLWTZSZboIINGee7qO73MaUoaGuQziiHYPdye5/Q3H/bNjVASRBAd++JVR+UmEP+e/hZpXopBRX8ei1/svEF0rbsdCdR84Bxp5yJ3q0ahJAerEDPmVn+lZ0=

In-reply-to: <01d401c6a479$7ab92570$e90ddb84@your029b8cecfe>

References: <01d401c6a479$7ab92570$e90ddb84@your029b8cecfe>

On 7/10/06, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

Hi,

We reached a sort-of decision in CCAMP today on the future of GELS. You can
see this on the chairs slides at
http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06jul/slides/ccamp-15.ppt#286,8,GELS ?

One question remains.
Should the GELS mailing list continue or should all discussions move to the
CCAMP list?

I am personally inclined to think that the separate list is a useful venue
for discussions that might not be completely dedicated to GMPLS protocol
issues. On the other hand, maybe the WG would like all discussions in the
same place.

I would prefer that we stopped copying emails to both lists.

Opinions?
Adrian

References:

Future of the GELS mailing list
- From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>