RE: draft-bonica-tunneltrace-02

["Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com>]

         Shahram,

         I have referred to those previous emails, which is why I asked you
to elaborate. I don't think that there have been any good points for
discounting Ron's approach presented therein (one was an open-ended
  reference to not meeting requirements and the other about not fitting
into an ITU framework that is irrelevant here in the IETF). I am curious about
what specific details in Ron's approach you think don't work and why.

         --Tom

>Please refer to previous emails by me and David Allan. Most of them are 
>listed there.
>
>-Shahram
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas D. Nadeau [mailto:tnadeau@cisco.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 9:24 AM
> > To: Shahram Davari
> > Cc: 'Randy Bush'; Cuevas, Enrique G, ALASO; ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> > Subject: RE: draft-bonica-tunneltrace-02
> >
> >
> >
> > >It has serious security, complexity, backward compatibility
> > and layer
> > >violation issues.
> >
> >          Can you elaborate on what you think these are?
> >
> >          --Tom
> >
> >
> >
> > >-Shahram
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@research.att.com]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 8:56 AM
> > > > To: Shahram Davari
> > > > Cc: Cuevas, Enrique G, ALASO; ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> > > > Subject: RE: draft-bonica-tunneltrace-02
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Are you suggesting that any draft that falls in the
> > > > charter, no matter how
> > > > > good or bad it is, MUST become a WG document?
> > > >
> > > > one can imagine extreme cases of any principle.  one can also
> > > > just get to
> > > > work.
> > > >
> > > > randy
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------
> > Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
> >



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.