Re: draft-bonica-tunneltrace-02

[Loa Andersson <loa.andersson@utfors.se>]

In line

David Allan wrote:

> Loa:
> 
> I guess my concern is fairly simple. There is an element of reverse 
> engineering of requirements from a specific solution (GTTP) embodied in 
> this document. 


given that that is the case why not simple weed it out as a part of
the normal wg-process, that is what a wg do, take some less than good
enough to go to a wg last call and improve it to be good enough for
the wg to have rough consensus on. and then ship it to the iesg, if it
were bug free to start with it could go to the iesg directly

i would understand if you said, not the wg should not work in this
area. but i can't understand this is something we should work with
but we have to wait until the doc (by some magic) is good enough. that
is wg job

/loa
-- 
Loa Andersson
Chief Architect,
Utfors Research, Architecture and Future Lab (URAX)
Utfors AB
Råsundavägen 12
Box 525, 169 29 Solna
Office          +46 8 5270 2000
Office direct   +46 8 5270 5038
Mobile          +46 70 848 5038
Email           loa.andersson@utfors.se
WWW             www.utfors.se