Christian Huitema wrote:
Essentially, expecting to get a functioning 6to4 relay is expecting a free lunch. Who is going to pay for it?Alain is using some extreme language, but there really is an issue with
> the deployment model for 6to4 relays.
James is observing that some public relays are broken, perhaps deliberately.
> This point was raised during the discussion of the "anycast relay" RFC.Instead of trying to "fix" 6to4, which also has this rather annoying issue called NAT which it can't 1,2,3 bypass, why not simply push Teredo forward which has all these points resolved already?
Greets, Jeroen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature