RE: What we disagree on RE: TE Requirements Draft-ELSP

[Shai Herzog <sherzog@hyperchip.com>]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Francois Le Faucheur [mailto:flefauch@europe.cisco.com]
>Sent: December 7, 2001 8:08 AM
>
>This would also help avoiding the above fascinating situation 
>where, in two 
>consecutive paragraphs , I am simultaneously :
>         - accused of being religious because I am too closed 
>to adding 
>options [ie arguing against (iiia) because of its protocol extensions]
>         - accused of being religious because I am too open to adding 
>options [ie arguing that it is OK to allow option (ii) since 
>it doesn't 
>require any protocol extension].
>Funny world.
>

Your right, it is funny. They say that if your proposal gets heat equally
from all directions it must be the right and balanced one...

Well,... not in this case ;-)

Shai