Re: WG Last Call draft-ietf-sming-reqs-04.txt

[Jon Saperia <saperia@jdscons.com>]

> 
> >>>>> Jon Saperia writes:
> 
> Jon> If it as an rfc, even an informational one, and it has the words
> Jon> requirements and sming in it, then I think it is way bloated and
> Jon> will not serve the purpose of advancing management.
> 
> Did you read the latest version? We have carefully replaced
> requirement with objective based on the WG discussions in London.
> 
> (Removing SMIng from the document is hard as it is all about SMIng.)

Juergen yes I read both. The word between requirements and sming
in my note was 'and'. 

As I also said previously, lets see what others have to say. I will read
the thread when I get back from vacation. 


Thanks,
/jon
--

Jon Saperia		     saperia@jdscons.com
			     Phone: 617-744-1079
			     Fax:   617-249-0874
			     http://www.jdscons.com/