[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: WG Last Call draft-ietf-sming-reqs-04.txt
>>>>> Jon Saperia writes:
Jon> If it as an rfc, even an informational one, and it has the words
Jon> requirements and sming in it, then I think it is way bloated and
Jon> will not serve the purpose of advancing management.
Did you read the latest version? We have carefully replaced
requirement with objective based on the WG discussions in London.
(Removing SMIng from the document is hard as it is all about SMIng.)
/js