Re: SPPI data type assignments

[Juergen Schoenwaelder <schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>]

>>>>> David T Perkins writes:

David> I noticed that there are some conflicts with the data type
David> definitions in the SPPI I-D.

[...]

David> Thus, I believe that the SPPI should be updated to use
David> "[APPLICATION 10]" and "[APPLICATION 11]" instead of
David> "[APPLICATION 7]" and "[APPLICATION 8]".

Makes sense to me to use [APPLICATION 10] for Integer64 and
[APPLICATION 11] for Unsigned64. (And I realize that this comment also
applies for the equivalent definitions in the SMIng to SNMP mapping.)

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder      Technical University Braunschweig
<schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>  Dept. Operating Systems & Computer Networks
Phone: +49 531 391 3289    Bueltenweg 74/75, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Fax:   +49 531 391 5936    <URL:http://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/~schoenw/>