RE: minneapolis

[Richard Perlman <perl@lucent.com>]

Glenn:

The TIA WG is probably not willing to reconsider the IS-835-C prepay spec, 
although, IMO, such a review is needed since the spec is flawed (for one 
thing it uses VSAs with compound content requiring custom encoding/decoding 
for each VSA).

Richard

At 11:44 AM 9/11/2003, Glen Zorn wrote:

> Is 3GPP2 going to change their pre-paid implementation based upon the
> (proposed) WG review?  If _technical_ review is desired, then this task
> would make sense as a (proposed) WG work item; if not, I'm sure that
> 3GPP2 is quite capable of checking their own spelling and grammar...


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>