[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: minneapolis

To: Glen Zorn <gwz@cisco.com>
Subject: RE: minneapolis
From: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 07:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: "'radius list'" <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <00b901c37894$bc7282e0$e79e4104@amer.cisco.com>
References: <00b901c37894$bc7282e0$e79e4104@amer.cisco.com>

> Is 3GPP2 going to change their pre-paid implementation based upon the
> (proposed) WG review?  If _technical_ review is desired, then this task
> would make sense as a (proposed) WG work item; if not, I'm sure that
> 3GPP2 is quite capable of checking their own spelling and grammar...

I've checked the 3GPP2 IETF dependency web page at:
http://www.3gpp2.org/Public_html/IETF/IETF_dependencies.cfm

and there is no mention of RADIUS pre-paid, only Diameter Credit
Control.

So from an official standpoint, there is no request from 3GPP2 (or any
other SDO) for RADIUS pre-paid work.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

References:
- RE: minneapolis
  - From: "Glen Zorn" <gwz@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: RE: minneapolis
Next by Date: RE: minneapolis
Previous by thread: RE: minneapolis
Next by thread: RE: minneapolis
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread