[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Is UML an option for the IETF?
- To: NIM List <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Is UML an option for the IETF?
- From: "Avri Doria" <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2000 09:16:50 -0400
- Delivery-date: Fri, 01 Sep 2000 06:20:51 -0700
- Envelope-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Organization: Nortel Networks - Routing Architecture Lab
In regard to Tom's suggestion that UML be used to describe the
Is it possible to use UML without graphics support? And if not,
can we justifiably use it as the IETF method of description.
Personally, I am getting comfortable with UML when using UML drawing
packages (e.g. Rose). But I find it very uncomfortable to use with
ascii characters. As far as I can tell UML is totally implementation
dependent; i.e. if you can't draw it, you can't express it.
Is there a way around this problem? Other by writing a graphic UML
to ascii character drawing converter for each UML graphics program?
+1 401 663 5024