[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is UML an option for the IETF?
It is certainly possible but would be extremely difficult to read
anything but the most trivial diagrams.
Avri Doria wrote:
> In regard to Tom's suggestion that UML be used to describe the
> Is it possible to use UML without graphics support? And if not,
> can we justifiably use it as the IETF method of description.
> Personally, I am getting comfortable with UML when using UML drawing
> packages (e.g. Rose). But I find it very uncomfortable to use with
> ascii characters. As far as I can tell UML is totally implementation
> dependent; i.e. if you can't draw it, you can't express it.
> Is there a way around this problem? Other by writing a graphic UML
> to ascii character drawing converter for each UML graphics program?
> Avri Doria
> +1 401 663 5024