Re: Status of Schema advertisement drafts WAS: FW: Status of netconf-schema-query

[OKITA Hideki <hideki.okita.pf@hitachi.com>]

Dear Mehmet and Bert,


Sorry for late reply.
We do not have aggreement for the schema-advertisement draft yet.

> a) submit one WG netconf-monitoring draft that incorporates the best 
>     ideas from the 3 of your drafts including the schema advertisement, or 
> b) prepare a separate schema-advertisment related document. 

I prefer the second choice for the document makeup since monitoring is
for dynamic status (NETCONF sessions and notification subscriptions) 
and schema-advertisement is for static feature (supported datamodel).

I try to arrange discussion point and make a joint -00 draft.


Regards,

Hideki Okita



From: Mehmet Ersue <m_ersue@yahoo.de>
Subject: Status of Schema advertisement drafts WAS: FW: Status of netconf-schema-query
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:48:19 +0000 (GMT)

> 
> Dear Mark, Hideki, Sharon, 
> 
> we sent you a request on the issue in the subject mid of January (see 
> the mail below) and asked whether you want to: 
> 
> a) submit one WG netconf-monitoring draft that incorporates the best 
>     ideas from the 3 of your drafts including the schema advertisement, or 
> b) prepare a separate schema-advertisment related document. 
>   
> Did you already have a discussion on how you want to proceed with 
> the Schema advertisement drafts? 
> 
> We have provisionally included a time slot for this in the draft agenda 
> (see parallel mail). 
> But the prerequisite for the discussion on the topic in the WG session is 
> your agreement on how you want to proceed and the submission of a 
> new draft before the IETF #71 meeting (we are going to be gracious if 
> it's a joint -00 draft). One possibility we discussed is also to merge with 
> the monitoring draft. 
> 
> So please get together and force the agreement for further proceeding. 
> We would like to encourage you to submit a joint draft before the IETF #71 
> meeting to be able to discuss it in the session and to get it one step further. 
> If something is not clear or not easy to decide please involve the WG 
> co-chairs or discuss on the WG maillist. 
> 
> Regards, 
> Bert & Mehmet 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org 
> > [mailto:owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Bert 
> > Wijnen - IETF
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 4:56 PM
> > To: markscot@nortel.com; hideki.okita.pf@hitachi.com
> > Cc: Sharon Chisholm; netconf@ops.ietf.org
> > Subject: FW: Status of netconf-schema-query
> > 
> > Mark, Hideki, Sharon,
> > 
> > From the last IETF71 Netconf Minutes, we see that our AD (Dan) has
> > recommended that the authors of
> > 
> >       draft-okita-netconf-advertisement-00.txt
> >    and
> >       draft-scott-netconf-schema-query-00.txt
> >    would get together and try to come up with a common proposal.
> > 
> > Both documents were read by about the same amount of people (10-11)
> > and when asked who would like adopt each of the documents, they
> > both got some 5-7 or so supporters. So it is best to see if we
> > can merge the best from the two.
> > 
> > So, can the two of you (with your co-authors/co-editors) work together
> > to create a new (or merge your existing) document(s) that we can
> > put on the WG agenda for the upcoming IETF. The goal should be
> > to try and address the WG charter item that says:
> > 
> >       3. Schema advertisement: Currently the NETCONF protocol 
> > is able to
> >           advertise which protocol features are supported on 
> > a particular
> >           netconf-capable device. However, there is currently 
> > no way to
> > discover
> >           which XML Schema are supported on the device. The 
> > NETCONF working
> >           group will produce a standards-track RFC with 
> > mechanisms making
> > this
> >           discovery possible.
> > 
> > Note that the charter also says:
> > 
> >    This item may be merged with "NETCONF monitoring" into a 
> > single document.
> > 
> > That is why we also copied Sharon.
> > 
> > We as WG chairs would like to know what the 3 of you want to do:
> > a) submit one WG netconf-monitoring draft that incorporates the best
> >    ideas from the 3 of your drafts including the schema 
> > advertisement, or
> > b) submit monitoring document based on existing monitoring
> >    document and do a separate schema-advertisment related document.
> > 
> > In any case, we would like the documents to be submitted asap/timely,
> > so that they meet the -00 cutof date of 11 feb 2008. This so that we
> > have ample time to study and review and so that we can have a fruitful
> > discussion at IETF71.
> > 
> > Bert and Mehmet
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       Lesen Sie Ihre E-Mails auf dem Handy.
> www.yahoo.de/go