[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XSD alternatives
>>>>> Ted Goddard writes:
[...]
Ted> What advantages and disadvantages do people see in the different
Ted> approaches? Which is to be preferred? Is it desirable to
Ted> restrict modification of the base operations?
I believe your last question is the important one. It is important
to define how much extensibility in the protocol we want/need and
how this should be controlled.
Whether you then prefer a more traditional approach with a sequence
plus any or a more object oriented approach with an abstract base
class where you can add new operations by deriving new classes is more
a stylistic thing and what people prefer probably depends on the
implementation language they actually use (and if they use automated
implementation tools at all).
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany
--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>