Re: XSD alternatives

[Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>]

Juergen Schoenwaelder writes:
>Ted> Is it desirable to
>Ted> restrict modification of the base operations?
>I believe your last question is the important one. It is important
>to define how much extensibility in the protocol we want/need and
>how this should be controlled.

Especially given that we _want_ a protocol that is extensible
by well defined capabilities.  And how much of an impediment
will schema structure really be to those making extensions
that are considered tacky?

Thanks,
 Phil

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>