[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FW: RFC3535 question/clarification

To: lear@cisco.com (Eliot Lear)
Subject: Re: FW: RFC3535 question/clarification
From: Bobby Krupczak <rdk@krupczak.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 23:30:50 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: bwijnen@lucent.com ("Wijnen, Bert (Bert)"), netconf@ops.ietf.org ("Netconf (E-mail)"), rja@extremenetworks.com (RJ Atkinson)
In-reply-to: <no.id> from "Eliot Lear" at Sep 12, 2003 05:46:22 PM

Hi!

>The systemic separation has very broad architectural implications.  If 
>you have specific operator examples of where this would be useful, I'd 
>like to see them.

I agree.

It may be useful to define some sort of relation filtering instead.
That is, one could say show routes of type X.

Bobby

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

Prev by Date: Re: FW: RFC3535 question/clarification
Next by Date: RE: RFC3535 question/clarification
Previous by thread: Re: FW: RFC3535 question/clarification
Next by thread: RE: RFC3535 question/clarification
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread