RE: more on ASN.1 and SOAP

["Hunkins, Andrew" <ahunkins@unimax.com>]

I witnessed the work on the ECTF S.200 (I think that's the right number)
where they used ASN.1 for encoding the transmission itself (not the
description of it), and I recall they later regretted the decision.  I
don't know why.

-Andrew


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Presuhn [mailto:randy_presuhn@mindspring.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 11:49 AM
> To: netconf
> Subject: Re: more on ASN.1 and SOAP
> 
> 
> Hi -
> 
> > From: "Andy Bierman" <abierman@cisco.com>
> > To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
> > Cc: "netconf" <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 9:40 AM
> > Subject: Re: more on ASN.1 and SOAP
> ...
> > Is this for the documentation of syntax -- a replacement for XSD?
> ...
> 
> No.  It's about encoding rules.
> 
> Randy
> 
> 
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>