RE: FW: netconf WG charter proposal

[Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>]

At 10:37 AM 4/6/2003 -0400, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> as an occasional operator, my only concern is that
>>>   o i will be able to use the transport(s) to get to all devices
>>>   o the transport is reliable, secure, apple pie, ...
>>>   o i am used to ssh/scp/..., but can live with anything that
>>>     actually works
>> And so... does BEEP meet your reuirements?
>> I doubt it has been implemented on many (if any) nerwork devices?
>> And so I wonder how much real-life experience there is to declare
>> that BEEP has the attributes you ask for.
>
>you have your finger on the problem

Should we remove direct references to BEEP from the charter,
and say instead that one or more transport mapping documents
(TBD) will be developed?  Selecting the transport mapping(s) 
will be part of the WG effort.


>randy

Andy


--
to unsubscribe send a message to xmlconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/xmlconf/>