[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: FW: netconf WG charter proposal
- To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
- Subject: RE: FW: netconf WG charter proposal
- From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
- Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 10:37:53 -0400
- Cc: xml config list <xmlconf@ops.ietf.org>
- References: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B1550148429B@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
>> as an occasional operator, my only concern is that
>> o i will be able to use the transport(s) to get to all devices
>> o the transport is reliable, secure, apple pie, ...
>> o i am used to ssh/scp/..., but can live with anything that
>> actually works
> And so... does BEEP meet your reuirements?
> I doubt it has been implemented on many (if any) nerwork devices?
> And so I wonder how much real-life experience there is to declare
> that BEEP has the attributes you ask for.
you have your finger on the problem
randy
--
to unsubscribe send a message to xmlconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/xmlconf/>