RE: FW: netconf WG charter proposal

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

</ad>

>>>> as an occasional operator, my only concern is that
>>>>   o i will be able to use the transport(s) to get to all devices
>>>>   o the transport is reliable, secure, apple pie, ...
>>>>   o i am used to ssh/scp/..., but can live with anything that
>>>>     actually works
>>> And so... does BEEP meet your reuirements?
>>> I doubt it has been implemented on many (if any) nerwork devices?
>>> And so I wonder how much real-life experience there is to declare
>>> that BEEP has the attributes you ask for.
>> you have your finger on the problem
> 
> Should we remove direct references to BEEP from the charter,
> and say instead that one or more transport mapping documents
> (TBD) will be developed?  Selecting the transport mapping(s) 
> will be part of the WG effort.

dunno.  do or will all interesting devices beep?  ask some more
operators and our area director.

randy


--
to unsubscribe send a message to xmlconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/xmlconf/>