[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] canonicalization
- To: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>
- Subject: Re: [idn] canonicalization
- From: James Seng <jseng@pobox.org.sg>
- Date: Sun, 28 May 2000 14:28:44 +0800
- CC: idn@ops.ietf.org
- Delivery-date: Sat, 27 May 2000 23:25:52 -0700
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote:
> - The canonicalization performed MUST NOT cause the data returned to
> be different for the same request sent from different locations or to
> different servers.
See [1]. It already have "any system anywhere". Canonicalization must not
break [1] can be taken for granted.
> Why "canonicalization and folding rules" instead of just
> "canonicalization"? We don't have hard-and-fast definitions for each,
> and it seems that the folding rules we have discussed so far would
> easily be part of the canonicalization.
Canonicalization rules may not be sufficient. But it is a minor point here.
-James Seng