[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] canonicalization



At 10.04 +0800 00-05-28, James Seng wrote:
>- The protocol SHOULD have some form of canonicalization and folding rules
>   such that equivalent names are folded into one. It is understood that
>   these rules would not be 100% perfect or accurate.

...but always produce the same result, regardless of who is using the 
algorithm.

    paf