[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] Comparisons of the proposals

To: Dan <Dan.Oscarsson@trab.se>,idn@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [idn] Comparisons of the proposals
From: bill@mail.nic.nu (J. William Semich)
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 14:25:07 -0500
Delivery-date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:29:27 -0800
Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com

At 02:34 PM 3/25/00 +0100, Dan wrote:

<snip>

>Some have said that you do not want to have zone files encoded in
>ASCII compatibility encodings (ACE) like CIDNUC. In my draft, the zone
>files will not be in an ACE format, instead the DNS server will,
>if queried from non internatialisation aware DNS software, repond with
>domain names encoded using ACE. And it is the DNS server that does
>the encoding into ACE.
>


Why not just have it respond with an associated (and required ) ASCII DNAME??

Bill Semich


Bill Semich
President and Founder
.NU Domain Ltd
http://whats.nu
bill@mail.nic.nu

Prev by Date: Re: [idn] KRNIC position paper
Next by Date: Re: [idn] Comparisons of the proposals
Prev by thread: Re: [idn] Comparisons of the proposals
Next by thread: Re: [idn] Comparisons of the proposals
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread