Re: [idn] Requirements: sorting

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald@Alvestrand.no>]

At 20:48 03.02.00 +0100, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>--On 2000-02-03 08.14 -0800, "Paul Hoffman / IMC" <phoffman@imc.org> wrote:
>
> > I couldn't find any requirement in RFC 1034 or RFC 1035 that required
> > sorting by names. Is this requirement in any other DNS standard?
>
>DNSSEC requires sorting for the NXT records, but the sorting can be based
>on binary values (for example in the case of 10646 the code point itself,
>i.e. U+0345 > U+0344), as it is not intended to be consumed by humans, but
>to detect where "no records exists".

Does DNSSEC sorting fold case?

                 Harald

--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
Harald.Alvestrand@edb.maxware.no