[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: This WG in context of RFC 2277

To: Patrik Fältström <paf@swip.net>, "J. William Semich" <bill@mail.nic.nu>, Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald@Alvestrand.no>, "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>, idn@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: This WG in context of RFC 2277
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@swip.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 18:41:48 +0100
cc: pvm@a21.com
Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 09:44:40 -0800
Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com

--On 2000-01-26 16.05 +0100, Patrik Fältström <paf@swip.net> wrote:

> This is a major work item for the IETF which impacts a lot of things. One
> can not, I repeat not, "just" fix things by storing things in DNS and hope
> that applications using domainnames can handle some encoding without
> reviewing the RFCs specifying the applications, and probably updating
> them.

I have to emphasize that I said that we should REVIEW the RFCs. I don't see
that we SHOULD update all other protocol that exists in the world, and of
course is it excellent if we don't have to.

  paf

Prev by Date: Re: An argument against multiple character sets
Next by Date: RE: China
Prev by thread: Re: This WG in context of RFC 2277
Next by thread: Re: This WG in context of RFC 2277
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread