[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: This WG in context of RFC 2277

To: "J. William Semich" <bill@mail.nic.nu>
Subject: Re: This WG in context of RFC 2277
From: James Seng <jseng@pobox.org.sg>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 08:53:03 +0800
CC: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald@Alvestrand.no>, "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>, idn@ops.ietf.org, pvm@a21.com
Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 17:21:35 -0800
Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com

RFC2277, if I am not wrong is a BCP, not a Standard RFC.

-James Seng

"J. William Semich" wrote:
> 3.1.  What charset to use
> 
>    All protocols MUST identify, for all character data, which charset is
>    in use. Protocols MUST be able to use the UTF-8 charset, which consists of
>    the ISO 10646 coded character set combined with the UTF-8 character
>    encoding scheme, as defined in [10646] Annex R (published in
>    Amendment 2), for all text...

Prev by Date: Re: An argument against multiple character sets
Next by Date: Unofficial web site for this mailing list
Prev by thread: Re: This WG in context of RFC 2277
Next by thread: Re: This WG in context of RFC 2277
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread