[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ipv6 anycast

To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Subject: Re: ipv6 anycast
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:32:57 +0900
Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, IPv6 v6ops <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1009011226520.9708@netcore.fi>
References: <m2fwxuyn26.wl%randy@psg.com> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1009010918170.13746@uplift.swm.pp.se> <alpine.LRH.2.00.1009011226520.9708@netcore.fi>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)

> So practically there's only a single anycast concept now in IPv6 as 
> well.

then explain why there is reservation for an anycast address on a subnet
link?

randy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ipv6 anycast
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

References:
- ipv6 anycast
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
- Re: ipv6 anycast
  - From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
- Re: ipv6 anycast
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: ipv6 anycast
Next by Date: Re: ipv6 anycast
Previous by thread: Re: ipv6 anycast
Next by thread: Re: ipv6 anycast
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread