[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establish a new WG

To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Subject: Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establish a new WG
From: Rémi Després <remi.despres@free.fr>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 08:00:44 +0200
Cc: v4tov6transition@ietf.org, IPv6 v6ops <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, joanthan Peng <jonathan8304@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <m2occng1v3.wl%randy@psg.com>
References: <AANLkTinUio_QE-gSQCjy2uTrSsrJB+iXuy-ALRDVguTS@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=rr7M+BrHgs7o1GZUUQyPBzhRwnzSqb=wwo0cq@mail.gmail.com> <32807B28-C3C0-47AC-9916-3C9048041F94@free.fr> <m2occng1v3.wl%randy@psg.com>

Le 27 août 2010 à 23:52, Randy Bush a écrit :

>> If v6ops isn't the place to do this work, and write consensus answers
>> to ALL questions that people involved in IPv6 deployments may ask
> 
> then why the heck would v6ops exist?

Whether v6ops is the place not only for OAM questions, but ALSO for customer and product-vendor considerations, is IMHO still unclear.
Making official where the work on a comprehensive and easily readable FAQ-document may start would be welcome.

RD


  
> 
> randy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establish a new WG
  - From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>

References:
- Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establish a new WG
  - From: Rémi Després <remi.despres@free.fr>
- Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establish a new WG
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establish a new WG
Next by Date: Re: [v4tov6transition] I-Ds in the pipeline
Previous by thread: Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establish a new WG
Next by thread: Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establish a new WG
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread