[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establish a new WG

To: Rémi Després <remi.despres@free.fr>
Subject: Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establish a new WG
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 06:52:16 +0900
Cc: v4tov6transition@ietf.org, IPv6 v6ops <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, joanthan Peng <jonathan8304@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <32807B28-C3C0-47AC-9916-3C9048041F94@free.fr>
References: <AANLkTinUio_QE-gSQCjy2uTrSsrJB+iXuy-ALRDVguTS@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=rr7M+BrHgs7o1GZUUQyPBzhRwnzSqb=wwo0cq@mail.gmail.com> <32807B28-C3C0-47AC-9916-3C9048041F94@free.fr>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)

> If v6ops isn't the place to do this work, and write consensus answers
> to ALL questions that people involved in IPv6 deployments may ask

then why the heck would v6ops exist?

randy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establish a new WG
  - From: Rémi Després <remi.despres@free.fr>

References:
- Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establish a new WG
  - From: Rémi Després <remi.despres@free.fr>

Prev by Date: Annotated Bibliography of v4v6 Transition Docs
Next by Date: Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establish a new WG
Previous by thread: Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establish a new WG
Next by thread: Re: [v4tov6transition] Some opinions about establish a new WG
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread