Re: [Int-area] Review of draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-05

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

>> I think there is a great reason to suggest that access and transit 
>> networks to offer their downstreams /48, /52, /56, and /60 options at 
>> various costs.
> 
> I can understand the /48 and /56 options (for corporate and
> residential respectively), but I don't really get the /52 and
> /60. What is the cost difference to the ISP that warrants a different
> end user price for these services, and isn't it just an extra cost to
> switch the user between these services (reprovisioning) when their
> needs change?

and why is the ietf discussing ephemeral operator pricing models?

randy