[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Int-area] Review of draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-05

To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Review of draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-05
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 14:01:42 +0900
Cc: Mark Smith <ipng@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org>, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, int-area@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <4C6F59E3.4030503@gmail.com>
References: <D74F3837-E115-49FB-A9AB-5E0C53406621@tony.li> <28C4A15C-DE54-4DD2-A5FD-33BFF66EFE83@cisco.com> <20100821105912.65da34e3@opy.nosense.org> <4C6F59E3.4030503@gmail.com>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)

> But we have moved on since then, and I believe that 3177bis hits
> the mark fairly accurately (given that we now have DHCPv6 where
> needed).

not exactly.  we have dhcp5.5, as we all know only too well.

randy

References:
- Review of draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-05
  - From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
- Re: [Int-area] Review of draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-05
  - From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
- Re: [Int-area] Review of draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-05
  - From: Mark Smith <ipng@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org>
- Re: [Int-area] Review of draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-05
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Votes against what? [ draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines WGLC]
Next by Date: Re: [Int-area] Review of draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-05
Previous by thread: Re: [Int-area] Review of draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-05
Next by thread: Re: [Int-area] Review of draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-05
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread