Re: New Version Notification for draft-koodli-ipv6-in-mobile-networks-02

[Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Simon Perreault
<simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> wrote:
> On 2010-04-16 12:02, Cameron Byrne wrote:
>>>
>>> In summary, that is *dual-stack deployments* that must be "encouraged"
>>> today.
>>
>> Disagree.
>
> Dual-stack deployment, as encouraged by the IETF, didn't mean IPv6+NAT44.
>
> In my opinion, IPv6+NAT64 is less evil than IPv6+NAT44.
>

+1

And in 3GPP Pre-Release 8, there is business case for it based saving
cost per PDP (cost per PDP in a vendors hardware charging model, or
cost per PDP in the related cost of signalling, state, and mobility
events of 2x the PDP).

Cameron

> Simon
> --
> NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
> STUN/TURN server        --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
> vCard 4.0               --> http://www.vcarddav.org
>