On 2010-04-16 12:02, Cameron Byrne wrote:
In summary, that is *dual-stack deployments* that must be "encouraged" today.Disagree.
Dual-stack deployment, as encouraged by the IETF, didn't mean IPv6+NAT44. In my opinion, IPv6+NAT64 is less evil than IPv6+NAT44. Simon -- NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca vCard 4.0 --> http://www.vcarddav.org