(not as co-chair but as myself) On 19 mar 2010, at 02.43, Seiichi Kawamura wrote: > > I fully agree with Brian here. > I would choose DHCPv6 inside my ISP/data center > network to do any dynamic node configurations where necessary. > Traceability is a MUST. > But I would like to have SLAAC in other areas specifically > services that connect nodes > that don't have robust amount of resources. > > So keeping SLAAC simple, but with the > options that are absolutely necessary to > get connected(default router and dns) > without relying on other protocols or manual > configuration, would be the best thing. I agree with what others have said. I believe there is a need for for both configuration options - yes, as Ralph has pointed out there are still some issues that needs to be clarified, but for me that would be part of the process of moving to PS. In my day job I often see a use case for SLAAC and I also see if used, not having the DNS option is often an issue. Best regards, - kurtis -
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part