On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Cameron Byrne wrote:
That means there are 2 of us now. Does that make it relevant conversation? Keep in mind, if it is hard coded in ipv6 in 2010 make
I have changed my mind.Looking at the scalability figures for current LTE architecture, your whole network will melt down before you even get CLOSE to 4 billion bearers, and even if you scale it past that, you just get a /30 instead of /32 and you can now have 16 billion simultaneous bearers.
Let's stick with /64 for simplicity and for all the other reasons stated before. Let's focus on getting DHCPv6-PD etc working over this /64 instead, much rather put effort into that than trying to get smaller netblocks into the standard. It also simplifies filtering etc, the standard model today indicates that enduser /64 is a subnet with one or more devices within the same administrative entity, let's stick to that.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se