Re: Call for v6ops agenda items

[Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>]

I'd be inclined to hear that.

FWIW. I guess it should be stated that I work for nokia again.

joel

teemu.savolainen@nokia.com wrote:
> Hi,
>  
> Would there be interest to hear about stateless IPv6 prefix delegation
> proposal - i.e. prefix delegation like in 6RD/6to4, but without
> encapsulation:
>  
> _http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-savolainen-stateless-pd-00_
>  
> This approach would make it easy to delegate (mainly slightly) shorter
> than /64 prefixes for a large number of devices connected via
> point-to-point links (e.g. cellulars). The con is extra consumption on
> IPv6 address space. I think the approach would be useful if many devices
> would need few additional /64s, but would not compete with flexibility
> of RFC3633.
>  
> Best regards,
>  
> Teemu
>  
>  
>  
>