[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: v6 multihoming and route filters




On 5 jul 2006, at 20.55, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:


And since the IETF is (hopefully) the place where internet routing is best understood an the IETF has historically always had an operational component (hence the existence of this very working group), I think the IETF can't shy away from at the very least discouraging harmful practices, and preferably also pointing out tradeoffs that exist between different choices and recommend best practices if such can be identified.

But the IETF have no understanding of the underlying financial motives. I certainly agree that it's bad practice but there is no way that the IETF in practice can enforce a policy of /48 multihoming OR filtering at /32 - except to present alternative technologies.

- kurtis -