Re: draft-ooms-v6ops-bgp-tunnel-06.txt and v6ops review

[Eric Levy-Abegnoli <elevyabe@cisco.com>]

On jeudi 9 Mars 2006 06:43, dheeraj.singh@wipro.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just consider the scenario in which the CE also supports the IPv4.  Then
> how the IPv4 MPLS cloud will cater this specific IPv4 packet.
What about it ? I don't see anything in the draft that will prevent such 
packet to be handled "as usual" by the PE and the MPLS cloud.
Eric
>
> BR,
> Dheeraj
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org on behalf of Fred Baker
> Sent: Thu 3/9/2006 5:46 AM
> To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: draft-ooms-v6ops-bgp-tunnel-06.txt and v6ops review
>
>
>
> We have been asked to read and comment on
>
>    http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ooms-v6ops-bgp-
> tunnel-06.txt
>    "Connecting IPv6 Islands over IPv4 MPLS using IPv6 Provider Edge
> Routers
>    (6PE)", Jeremy De Clercq, 18-Jan-06, <draft-ooms-v6ops-bgp-
> tunnel-06.txt>
>
> which is about to go into IESG review. As you will recall, this has
> been round the block, and deserves speedy review. May I suggest that
> you get your comments in by 17 March at the latest. Reply to the
> authors copying idr; if you are not on the list, the working group
> chairs will deal with the moderation issues.