RE: Reflecting new-MAM/SAM definition in diff-te drafts

["Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS" <gash@att.com>]

Dimitry, Francois,

> >     o SUM (Reserved (CTc)) <= Max Reservable Bandwidth, 
> >         for all "c" in the range 0 <= c <= (MaxCT-1)
> > 
> > However, this formula is incorrect for DS-TE when per-CT 
> > LOM's are used, since the above formula only reflects the Max 
> > Reservable Bandwidth for the entire link, and does not 
> > reflect the per-CT local overbooking factors.  So what 
> > formula do you suggest when per-CT LOM's are used?

> Wouldn't 'Reserved (CTc)' it the above formula already accounts for the
> overbooking multiplier at CTc?  I don't see how this formula precludes
> per-CT LOM's to be used. Please explain.

Are you then proposing these formulas:

1. When per-CT LOMs are not used:

     o SUM (Reserved(CTc)) <= Max Reservable Bandwidth, 
         for all "c" in the range 0 <= c <= (MaxCT-1)

2. When per-CT LOMs are used:

     o SUM (Normalized(CTc)) <= Max Reservable Bandwidth, 
         for all "c" in the range 0 <= c <= (MaxCT-1)

Is that correct?  Please confirm, and/or give the formulas you propose.

Thanks,
Jerry