RE: Reflecting new-MAM/SAM definition in diff-te drafts

[Dimitry Haskin <dhaskin@axiowave.com>]

> 
> Use of "Max Reservable Bandwidth" appears to be OK without 
> per-CT Local Overbooking Multipliers (LOMs).  That is, when 
> there is only *one* LOM for the entire link, then the formula 
> you give appears to be correct:
> 
>     o SUM (Reserved (CTc)) <= Max Reservable Bandwidth, 
>         for all "c" in the range 0 <= c <= (MaxCT-1)
> 
> However, this formula is incorrect for DS-TE when per-CT 
> LOM's are used, since the above formula only reflects the Max 
> Reservable Bandwidth for the entire link, and does not 
> reflect the per-CT local overbooking factors.  So what 
> formula do you suggest when per-CT LOM's are used?
>

Wouldn't 'Reserved (CTc)' it the above formula already accounts for the
overbooking multiplier at CTc?  I don't see how this formula precludes
per-CT LOM's to be used. Please explain.

Regards,
  Dimitry