RE: AD review of draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-04.txt

["Bokaemper, Martin" <MBokaemper@juniper.net>]

[ Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote]
> Martin> ZeroBasedCounter[32/64] allow that too, so I agree they are
> Martin> more appropriate to use here - I have not been aware of these
> Martin> TCs before.  I'll remove the Usage TCs again and will import
> Martin> and use ZeroBasedCounter[32/64] instead.  Any issues with
> Martin> that?
>
> ZeroBasedCounter32/64 is derived from Counter32/64 so the encoding is
> a Counter32/64 on the wire. In SPPI, there is no Counter32/64 and thus
> there is no defined coding.
[...]

It looks like the clean solution is to keep the 
Usage32/64 TCs we have now which are based on 
Unsigned32/64 from the SPPI.

Thanks,
Martin.
--