[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Charter questions
- To: "'Weiss, Walter'" <wweiss@Ellacoya.com>, "'Bernard Aboba'" <aboba@internaut.com>
- Subject: RE: Charter questions
- From: "Durham, David" <david.durham@intel.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 09:49:22 -0800
- Cc: "'Harrington, David'" <dbh@enterasys.com>, "'Wijnen, Bert (Bert)'"<bwijnen@lucent.com>, "'rap@ops.ietf.org'" <rap@ops.ietf.org>, "'Randy Bush'" <randy@psg.com>, "'David Mitton'" <david@mitton.com>
Seems the Bind PIB fulfills the requirements and architecture defined in RFC
2753, as it should.
-Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Weiss, Walter [mailto:wweiss@Ellacoya.com]
>
> > Well, it certainly sounds like you believe that you have developed a
> > completely RFC 2989 compliant AAA protocol. At the least, I'd
> > suggest that
> > this compliance be documented for all the AAA applications
> that you've
> > chosen to support.
> >
> As I said, I don't know if we are 2989 compliant and I don't
> know which AAA
> applications are supported. The goal of the effort was to
> define a mechanism
> for binding existing QoS policy semantics to authenticated or
> unauthenticated users and to leverage the Feedback work to
> get per policy
> statistics. If the RAP WG or the ADs think it is important to
> perform a 2989
> analysis, we can certainly include it in the next version.
>
> regards,
>
> -Walter
>