[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Charter questions
- To: 'Bernard Aboba' <aboba@internaut.com>
- Subject: RE: Charter questions
- From: "Weiss, Walter" <wweiss@Ellacoya.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 11:38:35 -0500
- Cc: "'Harrington, David'" <dbh@enterasys.com>, "'Wijnen, Bert (Bert)'" <bwijnen@lucent.com>, "Durham, David" <david.durham@intel.com>, "'rap@ops.ietf.org'" <rap@ops.ietf.org>, 'Randy Bush' <randy@psg.com>, 'David Mitton' <david@mitton.com>
> Well, it certainly sounds like you believe that you have developed a
> completely RFC 2989 compliant AAA protocol. At the least, I'd
> suggest that
> this compliance be documented for all the AAA applications that you've
> chosen to support.
>
As I said, I don't know if we are 2989 compliant and I don't know which AAA
applications are supported. The goal of the effort was to define a mechanism
for binding existing QoS policy semantics to authenticated or
unauthenticated users and to leverage the Feedback work to get per policy
statistics. If the RAP WG or the ADs think it is important to perform a 2989
analysis, we can certainly include it in the next version.
regards,
-Walter