[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 6rd attribute compromise?

Peter Deacon wrote:
> Hi Jiangsheng, just included reserved /w ascii example to be a closer
> match to the existing attribute format for prefix (RFC 3162 2.3)

  I agree with Peter here.  Leaving the reserved byte in place allows
many RADIUS servers to use these new attributes with only a dictionary
update.

  Deleting the reserved byte means that the IPv6 prefix for 6rd has a
different format than for all other IPv6 prefix attributes.

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>