Re: Federated Authentication Beyond The Web: Problem Statement and Requirements

["Hannes Tschofenig" <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>]

> My point is that I'd like the BoF to start open-minded. I believe 
> federated authentication for non-Web is a large and interesting area. I 
> would like to make sure that we don't rule out beforehand alternative 
> approaches. I am happy with a charter as outcome that specifies that the 
> WG is going to take the Moonshot approach, but imo that should be the 
> *result* of the BoF, not a *precondition*.

I understand your thinking. I actually had the same concerns initially but a more focused discussion really helps. Additionally, nothing prevents someone else to propose another activity (either in form of a BOF, or by submitting drafts to a working group).

I am quite happy with the scope of the work as being proposed. 

Ciao
Hannes

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>