Re: On issue 6: Avi review of I-D Action:draft-ietf-radext-design-13.txt

[Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>]

With which do you disagree when you say "No, it does not."
a) The above states that the approach taken by SDOs when working on their attributes was incompatible.
b) but as the document asserts SDOs dont have to be compatible with other SDOs.
c) Both of these statements

???


On 03-06-2010, at 08:52 , Alan DeKok wrote:

>>>> " These approaches are often incompatible, leading to
>>>>  additional complexity in RADIUS implementations."
>> 
>> The above states that the approach taken by SDOs when working on their attributes was incompatible - but as the document asserts SDOs dont have to be compatible with other SDOs.
> 
>  No, it does not.
> 
>  Alan DeKok.

Avi Lior
avi@bridgewatersystems.com
office: +1 613-591-9104x6417
    cell: +1 613-796-4183



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>