Re: SImple Security for small CPE devices

[Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>]

Merike,

If the document is already in v6ops, let's leave it there. I was
proposing OPS AREA only if it was looking for a home.

                                Ron


Merike Kaeo wrote:
> Isn't it a mute point for OPSEC since the wg is closing down?  Thanks 
> for forwarding to group George....I've been following v6 and  definitely
> was following this work.  Also, since the document is  already in the
> v6ops wg and specific to v6, were you proposing to  move the doc over to
> the OPSAREA wg Ron?  I'm not sure that makes  sense.  Especially since
> it's not a personal submission looking for a  home....
> 
> - merike
> 
> 
> On Jun 19, 2007, at 10:42 AM, Ron Bonica wrote:
> 
>> Folks,
>>
>> This is slightly out of charter for the OPSEC WG, but I wouldn't mind
>> seeing it in the OPSAREA WG. Dan, Scott, Ted, what do you think?
>>
>>                                       Ron
>>
>> George Jones wrote:
>>
>>> This may be of some interest to people here.   I know at least a  few
>>> people
>>> (Merike) had interest in security of equipment for SOHO way back 
>>> when...but
>>> it was *very* quickly deemd out of scope for OPSEC.
>>>
>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-
>>> security-00.txt
>>>
>>>
>>> FYI,
>>> ---George Jones
>>>
>>
>