[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SImple Security for small CPE devices

To: gmj@pobox.com
Subject: Re: SImple Security for small CPE devices
From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:42:12 -0400
Cc: opsec@ops.ietf.org, Ted Seely <tseely@sprint.net>, Scott O Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
In-reply-to: <c1468ac50706190932y400abbfav16978d2dc630c815@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c1468ac50706190932y400abbfav16978d2dc630c815@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)

Folks,

This is slightly out of charter for the OPSEC WG, but I wouldn't mind
seeing it in the OPSAREA WG. Dan, Scott, Ted, what do you think?

                                      Ron

George Jones wrote:
> This may be of some interest to people here.   I know at least a few people
> (Merike) had interest in security of equipment for SOHO way back when...but
> it was *very* quickly deemd out of scope for OPSEC.
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-00.txt
> 
> 
> FYI,
> ---George Jones
>

Follow-Ups:
- RE: SImple Security for small CPE devices
  - From: "David Harrington" <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
- Re: SImple Security for small CPE devices
  - From: Merike Kaeo <merike@doubleshotsecurity.com>

References:
- SImple Security for small CPE devices
  - From: "George Jones" <eludom@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: SImple Security for small CPE devices
Next by Date: Re: SImple Security for small CPE devices
Previous by thread: SImple Security for small CPE devices
Next by thread: Re: SImple Security for small CPE devices
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread